Former Goalkeeper Calls for Manager to Benching Expensive Flop After Disappointing Match

**The Disappointment of Antony: Is It Time for a Change at Manchester United?**

Former Goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel has voiced his concerns about the performance of Antony, a player for Manchester United, and suggested that the team’s manager, Erik ten Hag, reconsider Antony’s position within the side.

In a recent match against Nottingham Forest, Manchester United suffered a 2-1 defeat, with Antony being replaced during the game. This disappointing display has raised questions about his understanding of the game and his contribution to the team. Despite being one of the most expensive signings in the club’s history, Antony’s performance has failed to meet the expectations set by his hefty price tag.

**Underwhelming Performance and Criticism**

Peter Schmeichel, a former goalkeeper for Manchester United, highlighted Antony’s lackluster performance and pointed out that the player seemed to frustrate his teammates rather than contribute positively to the team. With a notable absence of goals and assists, Antony’s track record has been a cause of concern for both fans and former players.

Despite being given multiple opportunities to make an impact on the field, Antony’s inability to deliver has prompted Schmeichel to call for a reevaluation of his position within the team. The Brazilian player’s underwhelming statistics, coupled with a series of disappointing displays, have led to growing skepticism about his ability to fulfill the expectations associated with his high transfer fee.

**The Expensive Investment That Hasn’t Paid Off**

Antony’s transfer to Manchester United from Ajax for a staggering £82 million marked him as the second most expensive player in the club’s history. However, his on-field performance has failed to justify this substantial investment. With no goals or assists in 21 appearances across various competitions, Antony’s struggles have become a point of contention for the club and its supporters.

Comparisons with other players, such as Jadon Sancho and Facundo Pellistri, further emphasize the stark contrast in performance and contribution. Despite having significantly fewer opportunities, these players have managed to outperform Antony, raising further doubts about his suitability for the team.

Also Read:  Shoaib Bashir's Visa Delay Thwarts England's Test Series Plans with India

**An Urgent Need for Change**

The lack of tangible contributions from Antony, especially in comparison to his teammates, has spurred discussions about the need for a change in the team’s lineup. With other players demonstrating their ability to make meaningful contributions and impact the game positively, the pressure on Antony to prove himself has intensified.

As the expectations associated with Antony’s expensive signing remain unmet, it has become increasingly clear that maintaining the status quo may not be the best course of action for Manchester United. The pressing need for results and improved performance leaves little room for the luxury of persisting with a player whose contributions have been consistently underwhelming.

**Evaluating Antony’s Poor Performance: Who Bears the Blame?**

Antony’s recent dismal performance on the pitch has sparked considerable debate and criticism over who should shoulder the responsibility for his underwhelming product. The scrutiny of his lackluster display has prompted many to question whether it is a result of his own shortcomings or the instructions given by his manager, Erik ten Hag. Former Manchester United goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel was quick to point out that Antony’s struggles may not solely be attributed to his own abilities but rather to the tactical approach set by the Dutchman.

**Analyzing the Manager’s Influence**

Schmeichel expressed concerns about the messaging from ten Hag, suggesting that if Antony’s performance is a direct consequence of adhering to the coach’s directives, then the accountability falls on the manager. He emphasized that as a winger, there are certain expectations, such as delivering crosses from the byline, which Antony seemed to struggle with. Hence, Schmeichel’s critique delves into whether Antony’s actions were a reflection of the coach’s strategy, leading to questions about the manager’s role in the player’s poor form.

**Managerial Oversight**

Schmeichel’s assessment alludes to the possibility of ten Hag’s tactics not fully maximizing Antony’s potential, which raises questions about the manager’s ability to utilize the winger effectively. If Antony’s struggles stem from the implementation of ten Hag’s instructions, then it provokes an evaluation of the manager’s competence in leveraging the player’s skills to benefit the team. This perspective places the onus on the coach to address any shortcomings in guiding and developing Antony’s performance on the field.

Also Read:  Jayson Tatum Reveals Toughest NBA Opponent: 'He's Just Unstoppable'

**The Weight of a Hefty Transfer Fee**

Furthermore, the scrutiny extends to the decision-making process that led to Antony’s acquisition for a staggering £85m. Gary Neville, in particular, criticized the club for sanctioning such a high-priced deal for a player who has failed to meet expectations. The excessive transfer fee amplifies the scrutiny surrounding Antony’s performance, calling into question the scouting process and the impact of ten Hag’s influence on the decision. Hence, the management’s role in recruiting and managing Antony comes under intensified examination due to the substantial financial investment made in the player.

**Leadership and Responsibility**

The criticisms raised against ten Hag and the club’s decision-makers underscore the necessity for strong leadership. Schmeichel’s sentiment of the need for robust leadership at the top emphasizes the importance of decisive and informed decision-making. Commissioning such a high-priced transfer demands a comprehensive evaluation of the player’s abilities, the team’s requirements, and the manager’s tactics, which are pivotal elements influenced by leadership. Therefore, the accountability for Antony’s shortcomings extends beyond the player and the manager, casting a spotlight on the overarching leadership that governs the club and its strategic direction.


In conclusion, the focus on Antony’s poor form invariably leads to a broader examination of the managerial decisions, leadership, and the intricate dynamics that impact a player’s performance. Assessing Antony’s struggle necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the manager’s guidance, the club’s recruitment strategy, and the overall leadership at the helm. The complexities involved in unraveling the causes behind Antony’s disappointment underscore the multifaceted nature of responsibility within the realm of football management and performance.

This article is based on information provided by


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hot Topics

Related Articles