**The Breivik Case: A Far-Right Mass Killer’s Allegation of Human Rights Abuse in Norwegian Prison**
The case of Anders Behring Breivik, a far-right fanatic and mass murderer, is once again making headlines as he accuses the Norwegian state of violating his human rights while serving his prison sentence. Breivik, who committed the heinous act of killing 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage in 2011, is seeking to end his years of isolation in prison by filing a lawsuit against the Ministry of Justice in Norway.
**Legal Battle for Human Rights**
Breivik’s lawyer, Oeystein Storrvik, presented arguments in a court set up within the high-security prison, emphasizing the detrimental impact of the prolonged isolation on his client. He pointed out that Breivik has been isolated for about 12 years and only has contact with professionals, but not with other inmates. The lawyer highlighted the psychological toll on Breivik, stating that the isolation has led to suicidal tendencies and a dependency on anti-depressant medication.
**Violations of Human Rights**
The core of Breivik’s lawsuit revolves around the claim that the isolation he has endured during his imprisonment amounts to inhumane punishment, contravening the European Convention on Human Rights. Despite a prior unsuccessful attempt in 2016-17 when his appeal was denied by the European Court of Justice, Breivik is persisting in his legal battle. His efforts are not only aimed at ending his isolation but also at lifting restrictions on his correspondence with the outside world.
**Isolation and Its Impact**
The severity of Breivik’s actions, which resulted in the loss of numerous lives, has led to the argument by the justice ministry’s lawyers that maintaining his isolation is imperative due to the ongoing security threat he poses. They stress the relative nature of his isolation, citing his interactions with guards, health professionals, and religious figures. Additionally, Breivik is permitted limited social interaction with two inmates every other week, albeit under strict supervision.
One of the significant concerns raised by the justice ministry is the potential influence that Breivik could have on others if he were to have unmonitored contact with the outside world. It has been noted that his extremist ideology could be a catalyst for others to commit violent acts, as evidenced by his influence on individuals such as Brenton Tarrant, who carried out the heinous attacks on mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand in 2019.
**Verdict and Implications**
The judge presiding over the case is expected to issue the verdict in the coming weeks. Breivik, who received a 21-year detention sentence in 2012, with provisions for indefinite detention if deemed dangerous, awaits the outcome of this legal battle that could potentially shape the conditions of his confinement moving forward.
The Breivik case exemplifies the intricate balance between ensuring the rights of convicted individuals and safeguarding against potential threats to societal security. The legal proceedings surrounding his isolation bring to light the complexities of addressing the human rights of those who have committed grievous offenses while considering the repercussions of their possible influence on others. The impending verdict will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the management of high-profile inmates and the delicate interplay between security measures and human rights considerations within the context of the criminal justice system.